Code Of Ethics For Morality Approaches †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Code Of Ethics For Morality Approaches. Answer: Introduction The code of ethics is based on the morality approaches followed by the people in order to lead a good life. The most important consideration undertaken by the people is based on the perspectives of morality, which varies from person to person. The ethics govern the behavior of the people and therefore help in maintaining the behavior in order to make use of the good life. The dishonesty in terms of cheating creates a serious impact on the society and the individuals. The consciousness of the individuals affects the sense of guilt and afterwards the individuals realize the little earned favors of the dishonest practices they undertook. The people implement the modified moralities in order to enjoy the benefits that they expect out of the moralities. In order to implement the modifications people undertake many dishonest means. The interest of the people, according to the book by Ariely, influences the methods of dishonesty undertaken by the people[1]. The important consideration that is being undertaken by the people is based on the concepts of the change that the people undertake in considering the level of dishonesty. The book enumerates various examples that are being cited by the author in order to make the readers understand the level of the dishonesty that man adheres to and the modifications in the ethical systems undertaken by the people[2]. Discussion In this context, the Canadian government had undertaken steps in order to reduce the fishing practices in order to conserve the marine biodiversity. The most important consideration undertaken by the government is based on the requirements of the stable biodiversity and the issues that are being faced by the species falling in the belt[3]. The sudden shift from the ethics occurred due to the exercise undertaken by the boat captain through the diligent activities. The shift is based on the culture that involves high levels of dishonesty among the member of the team. The culture also influences the habits of pretention. It helps in the clear understanding of the peoples objectives on the subject. A question of ethics The rationally experienced captains are undertaking the exercise based on the principle of their dishonesty, which is born out of the honesty they try to portray. The discretion of the captains in the matter is an important factor that influences the decision making process of the captains[4]. It affects the ethics that are being followed by the governments control over the fishing activities. It overlaps the ethics to the extent of modifying the ethics and thereby cheating on the same. Ethics constitute of the moral principles that binds the activities of the people at large. Therefore, the psychological evidence that is being enumerated in the prescribed book helps in the shifts of the behavioral patterns of the captains relating to fishing. The norms that are being formulated by the government strictly restrict the fishing activities based on the quantity that is to be fished. Whereas, the behavioral pattern of cheating despite of the norms that are being formulated is the basic c onsideration that can be observed through the incident. Destructive professional behaviors of the captains may be due to the dishonesty and the fallacy they are into of cheating the enterprise for private gains. The behavioral traits help in determining the level of the dishonesty that the individuals incorporate. The government control over the resources helped in retaining the stock of the fish, that helped in both ways- redeeming the stock of the fish and conserving the biodiversity of the region thereof. The most important consideration that is being undertaken by the government is based on the economic conditions and the availability of the resources. The most important phenomenon that worked well with the action of the government is based on the consideration of the conservation and the sustainable approach of the government in order top retains the economic conditions of the nation. Effective governmental control incorporates important steps that must be taken in order to ensure the conservation of the biodiversity that is being challenged by the excessive fishing activities. The maintenance of the fish stocks has helped the Canadian government in maintaining the economic and the social conditions at the same time. The enforcement of the Acts in the year 1960 and 1970 have helped the government in taking significant measures for the government to conserve the endangered species not compromising with the living conditions of the communities and the stakeholders[5]. The fisheries were granted license by which they were entitled to draw their resources on a given range over the ocean. It helped in maintaining the biodiversity of the area. Therefore, it makes a significant progress for the economic growth of the fisheries. The maintenance of the stocks of fish is an important consideration that is being undertaken by the federal government in order to make sure that the economic growth is not hampered by the diminishing rate of fishing. The legal action taken by the federal government has improved the quality of living of the anglers and their families. The reduction in the rate of the anglers helped in stabilizing the economic upheaval that the fishermen community faced[6]. The economic issues being settled, the stakeholder options were proclaimed and pronounced a fixed remuneration of the employees. The reduction in the number of fishermen through the enforcement of the registration and the introduction of the fishing license have helped in conserving the marine diversity as well [7]. Quota and penalty The most important consideration that the government can take on the basis of conserving the life force of the diversity is based on the aspects of the fishing activities that are being undertaken by the Canadian federal government. The fishing activities are affecting the livelihood of many fisherman and their income. The income of the fisherman also gets involved in the governmental structure, therefore the growing needs of the organizational control was required in order to make sure that the proper governance and enforcements were made[8]. It helped the government in having a strict control over the legislation of the fisheries. The most important consideration undertaken by the government is based on the equal opportunities that are being provided to the fishermen. Therefore, in order to receive the utmost of the remuneration, for its own purposes, have initiated the control over the fisheries. The control of the federal government over the fisheries and the storage of the stock have helped in improving the economic conditions of the country. The government has undertaken the enforcement of the act based on the conservation of the biodiversity and the loss of habitat. On the other hand, the non-registered fisherman making use of the resources is being another issue faced by the government[9]. The unregistered fishermen had no provisions for paying their royalty to their government. Therefore, the government enforced strict regulations regarding the fishing activities. The enforcement of such activities have helped in improving the economic condition of the region. On the other hand, it created unemployment for the unregistered fishermen. The registered fishermen paid their taxes and therefore, they stocked up in order to hold on to the market. The most important concept of enforcing a norm is to make it universal. the norm forms the important part in the conservation process. Therefore, in order to make use of the services, the governmental control is an important point. The basic decision making power of the fisherman can be enhanced through the proper understanding of the norms that the fisherman must follow in order to conserve the biodiversity and on the same time create considerable revenue in the process[10]. The most important consideration that is being undertaken by the fisherman while judging on fishing the species is based on the sustainable approach. The sustainable approach of the fisherman will help in making long term profits. it helps ion holding on to the market. Based on the book that is being referred in this context of the discussion the dishonest practices yield very little outcome for the people and therefore adhering to the dishonest practices might affect the livelihood of the individual and the com munity at large[11]. The ethical point of view is undertaken while considering the society as a whole in order to make sure that the communities are not affected by the practices that are being undertaken by the fisherman. Proposal of changes Penalizing the accused is an important step that is being taken by the government in order to ensure that the law is properly addressed and adhered. In order to make sure that the legislation that is being enforced on the people are being followed by the people, the government exercises the penalty activity[12]. Penalizing the families acquiring large boats can be effective in order to enforce control over the fishing activities undertaken by the families. The dishonest practices undertaken by the families are therefore penalized. The government has summed up the various elements of the economy in order to make use of the concepts and marketing strategies that make up the economic structure of the nation. It is therefore the best way through which the government can gain control over the dishonest behaviors of the fisherman acquiring large fishing boats. Although the fish is a product that is available in nature and human is free to use the resource as per the requirements[13]. Conclusion Therefore, it can be concluded that the government enforced the control in order to conserve the biodiversity and thereby adhere to the needs of the consumers in this regards. The penalizing activities help in making the law more effective as the people are bound to follow the law as long as they themselves do not desire to be penalized for their actions. The diminishing biodiversity have led to the rise of the regulation that are being framed by the government in order to ensure the conservation of the biodiversity for its usage in the long run[14]. The penalties that are being enumerated by the government is v based on the requirements of the fisherman and their growing needs to hold on to the stock is being addressed through the actions taken by the government control. The penalizing action helped in redeeming the stock and therefore helped in the perpetual growth process of the economic structure. The most important consideration is based on the licensing part, which helped in un dertaking the right kind of actions and retaining the fish stock within a limited range of people[15]. References Ariely, D., Jones, S. (2012).The (honest) Truth about Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone, Especially Ourselves(Vol. 336). New York, NY: HarperCollins. Bryan, C. J., Adams, G. S., Monin, B. (2013). When cheating would make you a cheater: Implicating the self prevents unethical behavior.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,142(4), 1001. Bucciol, A., Landini, F., Piovesan, M. (2013). Unethical behavior in the field: Demographic characteristics and beliefs of the cheater.Journal of Economic Behavior Organization,93, 248-257. Cashin, R. (2017).Fisheries Policy.The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved 7 November 2017, from https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/fisheries-policy/ Fosgaard, T. R., Hansen, L. G., Piovesan, M. (2013). Separating Will from Grace: An experiment on conformity and awareness in cheating.Journal of Economic Behavior Organization,93, 279-284. Hilbig, B. E., Hessler, C. M. (2013). What lies beneath: How the distance between truth and lie drives dishonesty.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,49(2), 263-266. Hilbig, B. E., Moshagen, M., Zettler, I. (2015). Truth will out: Linking personality, morality, and honesty through indirect questioning.Social Psychological and Personality Science,6(2), 140-147. Irlenbusch, B., Villeval, M. C. (2015). Behavioral ethics: how psychology influenced economics and how economics might inform psychology?.Current Opinion in Psychology,6, 87-92. Levine, E. E., Schweitzer, M. E. (2014). Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,53, 107-117. Mulder, L. B., Aquino, K. (2013). The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,121(2), 219-230. Robert, I., Arnab, M. (2013). Is dishonesty contagious?.Economic Inquiry,51(1), 722-734. Rosenbaum, S. M., Billinger, S., Stieglitz, N. (2014). Lets be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling.Journal of Economic Psychology,45, 181-196. Van't Veer, A., Stel, M., van Beest, I. (2014). Limited Capacity to Lie: Cognitive Load Interferes with Being Dishonest. Yaniv, G., Siniver, E. (2016). The (honest) truth about rational dishonesty.Journal of Economic Psychology,53, 131-140.